Page 1 of 1

Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:05 pm
by AutisticMonk
I suggest that you add some meta-tags directly on your html page to get more search engine hits, unless you aren't ready for the exposure yet, whereas the online searches for 'king james statistics' are grim as of yet, but, I am on a mission to fix that this month. I have also placed your Bible Analyzer Link on my Statistics Page which is less than 20 days old, if you don't mind. I have many top ten listings and my statistics page will also be one within 30 days - carpus

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:35 pm
by Tim
Thanks for the kind words and the link. Yes, I'll try to take the exposure. I don't think search engines use meta-tags as much as they used to. They just scan the whole page, but I'll look into it.

If you have any suggestions for more types of Bible stats, let me know. Give me a couple of your most desired first and we will go from there.

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:35 pm
by AutisticMonk
I show many people 'stats' where they can find the warnings of nine/eleven, and then they say well it is easy to look in the past, blah, blah, blah, then I show them the dangers that are at 31, state number of California, which is at the 8th time zone, and they ignore it, even though they know that they live atop the fault line that Andrew found in 1895. Nevertheless, No One, and I mean No One, upon all the Earth, has built a program that can show the statistics that are in the punctuations. A desire of mine is to confirm or correct the statistics that I have found in the punctuations 30 years ago, I showed them the warnings that were in the 220 Parenthesis, but they ignored it, and I wondered; to how it was that they did not understand.

Nevertheless, No machine, or No program, or No Man, that I know of can accomplish this task, so that I may confirm or correct my statistics of the punctuations. THAT IS MY DESIRE, to know the statistics of every jot and every tittle as Jesus told us, that every punctuation has a Prophecy. Jesus said that man has learned to discern the Heavens and the Earth, but they can not discern My Word, and every Jot and every Punctuation will be fulfilled...I counted these things before the database was known to man, and yet I can not find a Human that can build a machine that can give me the statistics of the Punctuations of the Bible, but they can give us the grains of sand on Planet Mars. Can you perform this Miracle? O Timotheus? The 1st to Timothy as it was written....(drama added for entertanment value)

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:17 pm
by Tim
If what you want is to count the different punctuation marks in the whole Bible or by book, that is no more difficult than counting the words or letters. In fact, the counts of questions in Bible Analyzer is obtained by simply counting the question marks; phrases by counting all punctuation marks; etc. Is this what you have in mind?

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:07 am
by AutisticMonk
I'll write an Article on Scribd for you and within 30 days your BibleAnalyzer will
be on the top ten listings of every search engine with the 'query' King James
Bible Statistics. Because your work on the Word is Magnificent. I will do this.

Yes! 7,000 days ago this would of been considered to
be a most magnificent miracle. Statistics of Punctuations
per Book would show many Secrets which no one knows yet.
Scientists can tell us the grains of sand on Mars, but can they not
discern the secrets that are within the Word of God, Jesus said.

3298 - Question marks - [confirmed! thanks]
300 - Exclamation marks ? 220 - Total of Parenthesis ?
Psalm intro and NT endings not included
(Punctuations and alignments are as important as words I think
How else could we see this view from a 767 Jet)
[ : ]<---Can you see those two Towers outside that window?
[ ; ]<---Now one is one Fire -
[ , ]<---Now only one is left standing and is on fire etc...

Note: As Carp'us and Timothe'us were written about long ago, they performed Great miracles
with the Word, and the church increased. And the 411 in Military time is 1611 as in King James.

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:06 am
by Tim
You have a unique way of looking at punctuation. How d you deal with the differences in words (spelling), letters, and punctuation between the 1611 and 1769 editions of the AV?

I'll see about adding counts of punctuation to the table such as comma, semi-colon, colon, exclamation, parenthesis, period.

Thanks for the article in Scribd.

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:11 am
by AutisticMonk
The Ezra-Nehemiah Congregation Puzzle Solved by Carpus 1st.
So if we can find another DNA in the caps I could shut him up for a while :twisted:

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:28 pm
by Tim
Email your address to and we'll send you a CD for helping promote Bible Analyzer and for making a digital edition of the original 1611 edition of the AV available to the world. Also, check your email for the Bible Analyzer module. The fruit of your labors is returning to you. If you will show me the two errors I will correct it. I would say all the editions on the net came from your source. How long did it take you to type it all in? What a task.

I've only gotten one hit so far from your links, but they need time to grow.

The account you give of you and your friend is quite interesting. It would not be too hard to find all the caps either. I'll try to think of the best way to do it.

Re: Getting Better Exposure

Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:45 pm
by AutisticMonk
I am just now able to start using your machine to fix or confirm some of my old word counts.
So far I have found two corrections of my old 1769 word counts.

To (13576) was
[13573] corrected (change of 3)

Unto (8999) was
[9002] corrected (change of 3)

I count the NT endings last and, The last UNTO I found was The second epistle
[unto] Timotheus and is #9002......thats my dyslexic 2009...

I don't use the Psalm Intros so they are different then yours, but they are both correct now.
YOU GUYS ARE THE BEST IN THE BUSINESS...but don't let that make you lazy :geek:

since I have your link on my site I thought it would be a good idea to make my numbers correct :roll: so I did.